![]() HealthEngine also admitted that it misrepresented to consumers the reasons why it did not publish a rating for some health medical practices. HealthEngine admitted that it did not publish a large volume of negative reviews (submitted between March 2015 and March 2018) and edited other reviews to remove negative aspects. Until June 2018, HealthEngine also published reviews from patients about the quality and services of healthcare practitioners. It provides a booking system for patients and an online health care directory that allows consumers to search for and book appointments with healthcare practitioners. HealthEngine is an online health marketplace. They should also consider whether their policy may risk misleading consumers.Ĭase study of a business that suppressed and edited negative reviews remove genuine reviews that are negative.īusinesses and review platforms should ensure they clearly display their policy for publishing, editing and removing reviews.Negative reviews are manipulatedĪ business may mislead consumers if they: Read more in the Service Seeking ACCC media release. The Federal Court ordered Service Seeking pay $600,000 in penalties for making false or misleading representations by publishing these reviews. If the customer didn't respond to the review within 3 days, the review was automatically published. A business could give themselves their own star rating of jobs done. Service Seeking let the businesses on its platform draft their own reviews. Customers can seek quotes for jobs such as gardening, building or cleaning services from businesses on the platform. Service Seeking Pty Ltd is an online tasking platform. edited or changed by someone else after being created.Ĭase study of a platform that allowed businesses to create their own reviews.created by someone who hasn’t actually used the product or service.written by family, employees, or people paid in some way by the business to write the review, without stating the personal connection or commercial relationship with that business.Reviews can mislead consumers if they are: When reviews can be misleading Reviews seem genuine when they’re not These may be more reliable than those that don’t. ![]() Some review platforms require proof of purchase. reviews written in similar language as other reviews for the same business or product.generic reviews without specific detail about the business or product.many reviews written from the same email or IP address.a spike in highly positive or negative reviews over a short period of time.There are some features or signs that can indicate a review is fake. Read more in the ACCC media release Removalist admits publishing false testimonials. Citymove was issued with an infringement notice and paid a $6600 penalty. They changed them and then published them on its own review website. Citymove had copied testimonials from an unrelated review website. In 2011 we took action against removalist business Citymove for misleading online reviews.Ĭitymove admitted to making statements on its website that testimonials were genuine, when they were not. Consumer data right exemptions registerĬase study of a business that posted fake and misleading reviews.Resale price maintenance notifications register.Exclusive dealing notifications register.Collective bargaining notifications register.Authorisations and notifications registers.Pre-November 2017 merger authorisations.Public registers Expand submenu for "Public registers".ACCC submissions to external consultations.Merger and competition exemption consultations.Regional mobile infrastructure inquiry 2022-23.Electricity market monitoring inquiry 2018-25.Digital platform services inquiry 2020-25.Inquiries and consultations Expand submenu for "Inquiries and consultations".By industry Expand submenu for "By industry".Problem with a product or service you sold.Problem with a product or service you bought.Consumers Expand submenu for "Consumers".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |